Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bubwith Community Primary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bubwith. Reccomend against merger per Pit-yacker's comment regarding possible close paraphrasing - if information is desired in the city article, it should be written from scratch. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 12:57, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bubwith Community Primary School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Primary school. Zero refs. Appears to be non-notable. Delete (w/redirect to whatever makes sense would be fine) appears to be in order. Epeefleche (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to city or school district, per the well-established general consensus here for the vast majority of K-8 educational institutions. Since it seems there are a fairly vast number of AfD challenges of elementary schools today, I'm going to copy-and-paste this where appropriate, with apologies. The rule of thumb to redirect elementary schools and keep secondary schools is a necessary thing, a good compromise between those wanting a narrow, focused encyclopedia and those wanting a vast, expansive one. Rather than going to war over the notability or lack thereof of dozens or scores or hundreds of schools each day, we have a streamlined and ultimately effective process that most everyone can live with. Apologies to the creators of affected pages, but it really does need to be this way, in my opinion... Carrite (talk) 07:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Add modified text as a sub-section of Bubwith article. --Harkey (talk) 20:27, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - whilst there's more than there often is for primary schools, there's nothing notable here. Cut it down to what can be cited from the most recent Ofsted reports and then merge it into Bubwith as quickly as possible please. Blue Square Thing (talk) 23:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bubwith according to established procedure for non -notable primary/elementary/middle schools to article about school district or locality. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE to closer. If this AfD is closed as 'redirect', please remember to include the {{R from school}} template on the redirect page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Bubwith, where it is. This is the best solution for Primary Schools. Peterkingiron (talk) 00:52, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Bubwith. Acabashi (talk) 17:35, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No assertion of notability. Article is more or less a cut and paste (with a few words changed - the result of a copyedit at some point?) of the description of the school in its 2010 Ofsted inspection report. Having read a few of those descriptions on recent AfD, they themselves have a template feel to them. That is, they list a set of properties of the school, each of which is described as being average/above average or below average. I could well imagine that the descriptions are actually generated by a computer. Pit-yacker (talk) 15:05, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.