Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cui Lin (Hong Kong footballer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cui Lin (Hong Kong footballer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about former footballer which fails WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG. The only online English and Chinese-language coverage is trivial, such as transfer announcements and entries in statistical databases. PROD was contested without providing any evidence of WP:SIGCOV. Jogurney (talk) 16:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Hong Kong. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:39, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:05, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. I did not find sufficient coverage in my searches for sources to allow Cui Lin (Chinese: 崔琳), a footballer for Happy Valley AA during the 2009–10 season, to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. I found passing mentions in 1^{Internet Archive}, 2^{Internet Archive}, 3^{Internet Archive}, and 4^{Internet Archive}. Cunard (talk) 01:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Cunard's thorough searches. Lack of any suitable redirect or merge location so deletion is the only real possibility. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:49, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.