Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GFS Canada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Gordon Food Service. There are some arguments for a merge, but it doesn't sound like there's actually anything to merge, so that sounds like a redirect to me. The history will still be there, so if anybody wants to salvage anything to merge, go for it. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:39, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GFS Canada

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This prose is close to unreadable. In normal cases, could argue that the prose is worth fixing as the subject is worth keeping, but this article makes no useful distinction between GFS Canada and Gordon Food Service--and neither does GFS, if its website is any guide. So existing Gordon Food Service article should suffice. Doprendek (talk) 01:14, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Every Morning (there's a halo...) 01:58, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Gordon Food Service -- One article only ... and less promo language in any case. Rhadow (talk) 15:05, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd normally agree, but... can you actually find anything worth merging from here? I couldn't. Doprendek (talk) 19:10, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeh, the title. Rhadow (talk) 21:10, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Merge can't find references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.