Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OruxMaps
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, for now. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:39, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- OruxMaps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability of the subject is not proven. Tvx1 12:09, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 13:43, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Week keep: among GPS cognoscenti, OruxMaps is among the most prominent mapping applications for outdoor use, and a general Google search turns up plenty of links. But agreed: few of these meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. That's true with the sector, as well: a few other GPS apps that make use of OpenStreetMap data are widely used and discussed among a narrow cadre, but not much covered by conventional secondary sources. My take: the entry is stub-worthy. Barte (talk) 14:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. According to the article it is " rapidly increasing in popularity". I interpret that as not yet notable. DGG ( talk ) 21:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing suggesting the applicable independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:17, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.