Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russians in Argentina

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, withdrawn--Ymblanter (talk) 07:52, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Russians in Argentina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unsourced essay and potentially WP:Original research. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mexicans in Argentina: "If there is an encyclopedic article that can be written about this ethnic group, someone can try to write it another time when they have some good sources to base the article on" CaroleHenson (talk) 07:51, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This is clearly a valid article subject, and there is no rule that all unreferenced material ought to be deleted by default. As for OR, no comment has been made on the talk page. --Soman (talk) 18:26, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Soman. Unlike the case with Mexicans in Argentina (where I argued in favour of deletion), academic sources for this topic are quite easily located. I added a few to the article, and their bibliographies point to even more possibilities. 61.10.165.33 (talk) 20:51, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.