Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shanna Henderson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and redirect to The Glee Project#Contenders 2. Randykitty (talk) 15:40, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shanna Henderson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article refers to Shanna as "he" mostly (she's a young woman), is unsourced (BLP and notability issue), and she does not meet Wikipedia notability standards (see WP:MUSBIO and WP:GNG). Her claims to fame are a sixth-place finish on The Glee Project, an EP, and a recent, non-notable TV movie. Even if article was improved (it needs a major copyedit), it still wouldn't qualify under notability standards. BlueMoonset (talk) 13:30, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree with the assessment of the nominating editor. The major edits required and the lack of any sources required for a BLP certainly qualifies this article for deletion. Aytea (talk) 14:54, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:MUSBIO. --Clean-up-wiki-guy (talk) 16:24, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The_Glee_Project#Contenders_2 unless other sources establishing notability can be found. --j⚛e decker ^talk 00:54, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:30, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Joe Decker. Entirely unsourced BLP about a non-notable performer. Ivanvector (talk) 17:15, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Redirects are for those who are borderline notable that could possibly have an article in the near future. Subject clearly fails that and any notability. It should also be mentioned that the "website" given there is now for sale. — Wylie pedia 03:34, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The subject is listed in the table at the suggested redirect target, which is normally how we treat potential search terms, and it's not likely that we'll write any more about her. That, and redirects are cheap. Ivanvector (talk) 14:55, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.