Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True friendship
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. — foxj 21:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- True friendship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD tag was removed by an anonymous IP (with no rationale provided). My original concern was: Non-notable future film. (See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Future films) Pichpich (talk) 18:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete No coverage, extremely minor production and the article's a mess. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 20:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Where do I start? Not close to even being notable, the page is nothing more than a picture, WP:CRYSTAL, it goes on and on. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Blatant promotion, not even notable, the page is a picture, WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTAL. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 21:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I had to delete the Image, as I'm pretty sure that it isn't public domain. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 21:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.