Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vajrakaya Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vajrakaya Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N, no reliable sources, just some press releases, WP:SPS, and nonsense mostly. Tried to speedy as A7, but another editor believes there is a claim of significance which I fail to see. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:51, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:51, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:51, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not one of the current references is a good news article and my searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found absolutely nothing therefore nothing to suggest this company is notable. SwisterTwister talk 05:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A WP:SPA article which makes no claim that the firm is notable; the given references confirm only that this small firm exists (one says it has 1-10 employees) and issues press releases but nothing indicates WP:CORPDEPTH, nor are my searches finding anything better. AllyD (talk) 07:13, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete:- fails WP:CORP. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 08:22, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.