Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MasDeku/Archive
MasDeku
- MasDeku (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
02 June 2021
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Janjakim (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- JilleeLean (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- LilleeJeanCloutChasingFraud (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
All of these accounts are recently-created accounts and they all take the same side in an editorial dispute on the article Nicholas L. Bissell Jr. . There seem to be BLP concerns, as an editor on the opposite side asserts that "This is someone who has been stalking my daughter for three years on the internet." (The specific diff making that assertion is redacted from the history. However the assertion itself remains on the page [1].)
- Diffs for JilleeLean: [2] [3]
- Diff for Janjakim was redacted from history, but the user's comment is on the page [4] ✌️ The owner of all 🗸 02:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This is my only account. Nicholas Bissell's wiki page was shared on another website with a screenshot showing that Lillee Jean (the cause of the dispute) was added to the paragraph with absolutely no relevance to Nicholas Bissell. This caused several of us from that website to come to Wikipedia to try and fix it. The user that claimed "this is a person who has been stalking my daughter for 3 years" is the mother of Lillee Jean (they have confessed to this). I have no relevance to the person who is allegedly stalking her daughter, but this is the explanation as to why there were multiple people editing Nicholas's page at once. However, this account is the only one I have. MasDeku (talk) 02:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Considering the woman who was mad about her daughter being removed from the account posted my IP to try and say I was a completely different woman she wanted to doxx, should be easy enough to check the IPs and see I have no other accounts. JillieLean (talk) 10:39, 2 June 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JilleeLean (talk • contribs)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]The listed accounts are 
Unrelated, with MasDeku being at best 
Unlikely to one account (based purely on location), though I suspect meatpuppetry over socking. Primefac (talk) 10:52, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- With apologies to Deepfriedokra, I've ECP protected Nicholas L. Bissell Jr.. Given the WP:BLP aspects here, it seemed like a good idea to be a little aggressive about protection. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:24, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
04 June 2021
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
After the previous case at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MasDeku was closed, the IP continued to harass other editors. The IP should be blocked on that basis alone, but an investigation is requested to determine if the IP is evading a block as was placed on User:JilleeLean, User:LilleeJeanCloutChasingFraud, or User:Janjakim.
Diff [5] ✌️ The owner of all 🗸 19:10, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Question for @Blablubbs:, you say that the IP should have been filed in the MasDeku investigation, but how would that be possible if the IP's only edit (as you acknowledge) was made after the MasDeku case was completed? (I don't intend to try to re-open this case, I was just wondering.) ✌️ The owner of all 🗸 19:50, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
Check declined – Checkusers will not link accounts to IPs, per the privacy policy.. This should have been filed at the MasDeku SPI. I don't think the only edit on the /64 meets the bar for harassment; this may or may not be block evasion, but it's far from conclusive enough for me to endorse any action. Closing, I'll leave it up to the reviewing clerk whether to merge or G6 this. --Blablubbs|talk 19:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- @The owner of all, by simply filing a new case (which get added as a new section) with either Twinkle or the normal SPI case wizard (see also here for instructions). --Blablubbs|talk 19:52, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
