4.5. Very good. I see why young Joyce (and old!) was enamored with Ibsen. I've never liked the theatre but even reading this on the 82nd book of 2024.
4.5. Very good. I see why young Joyce (and old!) was enamored with Ibsen. I've never liked the theatre but even reading this on the page is an emotional and dramatic experience. And to think this came from the 19th century, and yet feels at most turns so modern. I'll be reading more Ibsen in the coming weeks, there's no doubt about that. ...more
My friend and fellow-booklover, J, who once studied under Abdulrazak Gurnah, recommended me this book. I've owned a few Gene Wolfe n81st book of 2024.
My friend and fellow-booklover, J, who once studied under Abdulrazak Gurnah, recommended me this book. I've owned a few Gene Wolfe novels over the years but never read him. He told me this was a good starting place. J is completely disillusioned from academia (he was once a lecturer himself) because of the elitism and narrowmindedness he found in the field. He tried for a long time to write papers and get Wolfe's name considered seriously among his peers, but to no avail. J promised me this book is complex. He even promised a near-on 'Proustian' beginning. I could not refuse.
And for 220 pages or so, it is insanely complex. The beginning is Proustian, or at least nods its head to the Frenchman, 'When I was a boy my brother David and I had to go to bed early whether we were sleepy or not', and throughout the other novellas I was reminded of countless other books, Darkness at Noon, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn . . . The three novellas collected as The Fifth Head of Cerberus slowly unravel a chilling plot about colonialism. Did the colonisers who go to Saint Anne kill all the aliens there (the shapeshifting abos) or did, as some people believe, the abos kill the colonisers and assume their forms and identities? Even at the end, I was left with so many questions and wanted to begin the text again. The most literary science-fiction I've read in a while. ...more
3.5. Better than the quartet and Companion Piece. Full of all the usual Smithian wordplay and strange humour and outsiders, but now 83rd book of 2024.
3.5. Better than the quartet and Companion Piece. Full of all the usual Smithian wordplay and strange humour and outsiders, but now in the future. Brave new world. Brave old world. Bravo new world. Gliff has two pages of meanings, but you'll get to that. Horses are important too (and have 'feathers'!). Identity, gender, dystopia. More linear and 'accessible' than some of her other works in that she plays games but always lets us know the rules. I'm floating around 3 or 4 stars. Not that it really matters.
Rumour has it, after being shortlisted four times but not winning, Ali Smith has asked her publisher now not to submit Gliff for the 2025 Booker. I'm not sure if this is true. A shame if it is, it feels bitter and out of character. Or she's tired and wants to turn her back on big prizes, which is understandable. Oh, and thanks to Penguin for the advance copy. ...more
I finished this last week but around moving into a new flat and not having any Wi-Fi, I haven't had chance to sit down and write it.80th book of 2024.
I finished this last week but around moving into a new flat and not having any Wi-Fi, I haven't had chance to sit down and write it. I read it in the south of France, in the Pyrenees mountains, so I was in the perfect place for another mountainous book of 'restoration'. The book I read before this one was Mann's The Magic Mountain, which this book is riffing off. The basic premise is the same, but where Hans Castorp was a young engineer going into the Swiss mountains to visit his cousin, Mieczyslaw Wojnicz (Voy-nitch) is a young sewage infrastructure is heading up into the Silesian mountains for tuberculosis treatment. As the second title suggests, Tokarczuk is turning Mann on its head: this is a 'horror' story. It's not an overt horror, and if you've read Mann's novel, then you'll find much of this in the same vein. Long days of routine or else no routine and discussions on various subjects. Of course, being the size it is, Tokarczuk does not write discussions as long as Mann did. A lot of them centre around women and their roles in the world.
I won't spoil all the extra layers that Tokarczuk adds, or even tiptoe into the concept of the 'horror' story within the pages, but I will say she plays with gender, sexuality and the self, among other things. If you know anything about Mann's biography then these things align somewhat. There is even a flashback scene, in Wojnicz's school, concerning another male pupil and his pencil. Again, those who have read Mann, will know what this means. If you haven't read Mann, the book would still be enjoyable, I'm sure, but the references and nods to the former text would be lost on you. They are as small as the word 'horizontal' being used once or twice. Tokarczuk is great. I cannot wait to see what is next from her; she is a consistently good and interesting writer. Deserving of the Nobel, I think. ...more
Read for bookclub. Not the thing I'd pick up of my own volition. The first chapter was cute enough, almost like a children's book. T78th book of 2024.
Read for bookclub. Not the thing I'd pick up of my own volition. The first chapter was cute enough, almost like a children's book. The rest of the book was the same chapter, almost verbatim, but with the name of the client and the foodstuff swapped out. Bizarre.
I will say, however, that modern fiction is so often just market-orientated. A restaurant that allows you to revisit your memories, a Japanese bestseller. Another book that is out/nearly out is about a photographer who allows you to revisit your memories . . . It seems many Japanese writers are trying to capitalise on the popularity of Kawaguchi's books....more
4.5. My flat-land predecessor, polyglot, female (believed by handwriting), age unknown, though I’m inclined to think young because p79th book of 2024.
4.5. My flat-land predecessor, polyglot, female (believed by handwriting), age unknown, though I’m inclined to think young because perhaps she studied the text, has written hundreds of remarks and comments in the margins of my copy of The Magic Mountain. These comments are in English, German and French, seemingly without any order other than the language she felt like writing in at the time. I doubt she has ever been “horizontal”, though so few people have been these days. Here is a selection of writings by my predecessor [all mistakes are my own in transcribing]:
‘Death’s relation to Life’; ‘Time of Storytelling’; ‘Time not natural’; ‘Úngeist’; ‘Paradox’; ‘die er damals offen gesehen’; ‘No distance from or concealment of feelings’; ‘too much Asia! ‘up here’; ‘Another lesson from Hans’; ‘spirit vs body’; ‘INTELLECT above all’; ‘Hans’ career — a matter of chance’; ‘Water!’; ‘Life is the same as Dying’; ‘The fall from spirit to matter’; ‘TIME!’; ‘love’; ‘music of death’; ‘bowler hats!’; ‘Language of Death — medieval pre-humanistic Latin’; ‘!’; ‘Homer!’; ‘Time & Human Progress’; ‘Compare Mann’s own narrative!’; ‘Dante!’; ‘Engl. gesellschafts lehre’; ‘Red and Green’; ‘strandspaziergang’ . . .
It goes on, and on. The same words appear over and over: death, suffering, life, form, east vs west . . . all the themes in the book.
And it is a magnificent book. I’ve withheld a single star for Settembrini talking slightly too much at times. Some of their discussions were fascinating, but if it was something I wasn’t interested in, then I wanted Hans to be off on another walk in the snow, or being ‘horizontal’, or reflecting on time itself. As many have said, the final chapter is astounding, and I read the final paragraph out several times to the empty room to sound it. It’s better than Buddenbrooks in that it is mature, insanely wise, complex (but simple! It’s 700 pages about death!), etc., etc.; I am glad I read it despite the time it took to do so. I’ve put Knausgaard aside just to read Mann and it’s taken me just under a month to read, which is a long time with a single book for me. It’s funny, too, warm. Life is the same as death. I fear death, sometimes for others more than myself. I can’t say The Magic Mountain has cured me of my affliction. Perhaps I need to go ‘horizontal’ for a period of time. I hate to use this, but I did find Mann’s dissection of nothing, no-time, very apt and even understandable from lockdowns during COVID. Without work, the days became short, but also impossibly long, and now time is damaged, perhaps permanently damaged, for everyone. Next year, 2020 will be half a decade away. Whatever you say about Time, it keeps moving; it will never wait for you or anyone else....more
Within something like 14 pages, I messaged Alan and told him to read it. Hachemi starts this thin book with some great metafiction, 76th book of 2024.
Within something like 14 pages, I messaged Alan and told him to read it. Hachemi starts this thin book with some great metafiction, ideas on fiction/short stories, on "his" hate of Hemingway, for example, among other things. I was quoting every few lines.
Bolaño, for example - reading Bolaño being one of the unwritten commandments - declared that 'a short-story writer should be brave' and drive in headfirst. Piglia claimed his lifestyle defined his literary style. Augusto Monterroso urged young writers to 'make the most of every disadvantage, whether insomnia, imprisonment or poverty; the first gave us Baudelaire, the second Silvio Pellico, and the third all your writer friends; avoid sleeping like Homer, living easily like Byron, or making as much money as Bloy.'
And further yet some advice taken from a number of writers,
I. A short-story writer should be brave. Drop everything and dive in headfirst.
II. Make the most of every disadvantage, whether insomnia, imprisonment or poverty; the first gave us Baudelaire, the second Silvio Pellico, and the third all your writer friends; avoid sleeping like Homer, living easily like Byron, or making as much money as Bloy.
III. Remember that writing isn’t for cowards, but also that being brave isn’t the same as not feeling afraid; being brave is feeling afraid and sticking it out, taking charge, going all in.
IV. Don’t start writing poetry unless you’ve opened your eyes underwater, unless you’ve screamed underwater with your eyes wide open. Also, don’t start writing poetry unless you’ve burned your fingers, unless you’ve put them under the hot water tap and said, ‘Ahhh! This is much better than not getting burned at all.’
V. Be in love with your own life.
VI. What sets a novelist apart is having a unique worldview as well as something to say about it. So try living a little first. Not just in books or in bars, but out there, in real life. Wait until you’ve been scarred by the world, until it has left its mark.
VII. Try living abroad.
VIII. You’ve got to fuck a great many women / beautiful women / […] / drink more and more beer / […] attend the racetrack at least once.
IX. You’ve got to sell your heart, your strongest reactions, not the little minor things that only touch you lightly, the little experiences that you might tell at dinner.
X. People in a novel, not skilfully constructed characters, must be projected from the writer’s assimilated experience, from his knowledge, from his head, from his heart and from all there is of him.
The writers behind this advice – in strict disorder – are: Javier Cercas, Arturo Pérez-Reverte, Jack Kerouac, Ernest Hemingway, Paul Auster, Roberto Bolaño, Charles Bukowski, Hernán Casciari, F. Scott Fitzgerald and Augusto Monterroso. (Exercise: draw a line between each author and his advice.)
Even the chapter titles are literary. Chapter IV is called 'A Chronicle of a Death Foretold' and Chapter VII is called 'Slaughterhouse-Five'.
But after Munir starts the 'story', we realise the book is about capitalism, exploitation (namely of animals for pleasure and money), veganism, and fiction itself, of course. I adored the first half and Hachemi's voice. I liked the rest of the book but not nearly as much. That said, I'm a fan, and will be following more of his translations when they hit the UK (presumably through Fitzcarraldo again, who also supply greedy me with Agustín Fernández Mallo translations). A love-letter to Latin American lit, Bolaño, who is named dropped often, as is Borges. At 114 pages, it's hard not to recommend it for what it's worth. Spanish-written fiction is overtaking Japanese lit as some of my favourite to read....more
3.5. So many paradoxical thoughts about this book: on the one hand it has so many fascinating ideas and 'predictions' of the future,75th book of 2024.
3.5. So many paradoxical thoughts about this book: on the one hand it has so many fascinating ideas and 'predictions' of the future, wrapped up in a post-Vietnam (Haldeman was a combat engineer, wounded in action) military science fiction, but equally has some ridiculous ideas (everyone in the future is a homosexual) that are told in bizarre ways and for bizarre reasons and so very American (and therefore, to my Britishness, very corny, in American fashion ('Try me, buddy.')).
The idea of the Forever War is brilliant as it captures the hopelessness and pointlessness of combat. Haldeman supposedly struggled adjusting to civilian life after his service, so the time-dilation in the book (when travelling through space for combat against the Taurans, Mandella doesn't age as much as earth. By the end, he has been fighting for over 1000 years in earth years). The Forever War is in fact 1143 years long. Not forever, but nor was the Hundred Years' War one-hundred years.
I enjoyed a lot of it in a non-intellectual way. That sounds belittling, but I don't read sci-fi for the prose but the ideas, so generally find myself reading more for pleasure than I would normally read something. Alongside some of the stranger ideas in the book, one that surprised me the most was this description, set in the 2020/2030s, so roundabout now,
Some of the new people we'd picked up after Aleph used 'tha, ther, thim' instead of 'he, his, him', for the collective pronoun.
I was startled that he'd even 'predicted' the timeframe.
More important coming from a post-Vietnam America, I think, but nowhere near as affecting or important as other science-fiction classics I've read so far. ...more
4.5. Janet Frame spent years in psychiatric hospital and treatment, and days before a scheduled lobotomy, her debut short story coll74th book of 2024.
4.5. Janet Frame spent years in psychiatric hospital and treatment, and days before a scheduled lobotomy, her debut short story collection unexpectedly won a national literary prize. Faces in the Water draws on Frame’s early life and treatment. There are disturbing descriptions of electric shock therapy and life in a psychiatric ward. The book was published in 1961, so Frame’s own experiences are no doubt from even earlier than that, so it is hard not to imagine the primitive care they were given due to lack of understanding. The book is a shocking testament to that fact. The final line of the first paragraph on page 1 sets up the tone of the novel, borderline apocalyptic:
The streets throng with people who panic, looking to the left and the right, covering the scissors, sucking poison from a wound they cannot find, judging their time from the sun’s position in the sky when the sun itself has melted and trickles down the ridges of darkness into the hollows of evaporated seas.
I could only really stomach a dozen or so pages in one sitting. Istina Mavet is a tricksy Nabokov-esque narrator; on one page we believe she isn’t ‘crazy’, that she has been wrongly institutionalised (at one point, after eavesdropping on some doctors, ‘And from that day it was understood that I did not remain at the sink listening to the Gods in conversation’), on the next, she describes simply how she sits down and pisses on the floor, or hurls herself at a glass window, or attacks a nurse. We are drawn into a complex and ominous inner world: which I think all of the best fiction offers us. Chapter 26 is immensely good. Almost every dozen pages I read, I was in awe, terrified, committing lines to memory and scoring page numbers.
And even when not examining Mavet’s crippled self and psyche, Frame’s prose on all accounts is so unbelievably skilful that I can not imagine why she is not discussed more. Several months ago, I had never heard of her or the novel at hand. Take this random description from the middle of a chapter,
It was autumn, with the trees in the town gardens turning gold and the mornings in chiffon mist and the cold sweat of dew clinging in chains to the grass blades. The derelict apples trees blighted and scabbed with lichen were shedding, with help from the blackbirds, their last caved-in rotten apples, and when I walked under the trees in the long damp grass, I squashed the fruit and ruined the houses of the tiny worms who had settled in for the season, webbing themselves close to the core, at the heart of the matter. All the dockseeds had ripened and fallen, and the stalks of the plants were steepled with milky white ‘spiders’ houses; …
Not a comfortable read at all, but so impressive in its style. The novel is, really, comprised of vignettes about the narrator, the different wards, ECT, the other patients, the doctors, the escape attempts, the deaths, the screaming, pissing, fighting, delusions and hallucinations. It reminded me very much of The Bell Jar at times, but it is far more graphic. Highly recommended.
And my ‘old self’? Having had warning of its approaching death will it have crept away like an animal to die in privacy? Or will it be spilled somewhere like an invisible stain? Or, discarded, will it lie in wait for me in the future, seeking revenge? What is the essence of it, that the thieves are like metre readers who unknowingly bear away a blank card, and furniture removers trustfully sweating at the weight of imaginary furniture?
I've been reading this for about three weeks, which is amazing as a book under 250 pages usually takes me 2-3 days. I felt, mostly, 77th book of 2024.
I've been reading this for about three weeks, which is amazing as a book under 250 pages usually takes me 2-3 days. I felt, mostly, apathetic about every story here. I like Enríquez, but I found most of these stories fairly similar in tone. At one point a character says a character's recent experience sounds like cheap horror flick and I thought the same about a few of the stories. I've got nothing against horror, but I just found these a bit corny at times. I liked the other collection of hers I've read well enough, so maybe I've been in the wrong mood for three weeks? Fans of her will probably enjoy this as it's much the same: demon children, lots of murder, ghosts, phantoms, etc., but this time with some strange disarming references too, like Game of Thrones quotes and talk of Funko bobbleheads. As always, thanks to Granta for sending me the ARC. ...more
Where The Children of Húrin, the “first” (the order doesn’t really matter) of the Great Tales, is a long, consistent novel about Túr71st book of 2024.
Where The Children of Húrin, the “first” (the order doesn’t really matter) of the Great Tales, is a long, consistent novel about Túrin Turambar, Beren and Lúthien is a tapestry of bits and pieces, some more incomplete than others, but collaboratively make a repetitive and multifaceted look at one such tale from The Silmarillion. There is a longish (100 pages or so) prose telling of the story which I guess you could call the main body of the text, then the next 200 pages are Christopher Tolkien’s attempts at structuring, organising, and making sense of his father’s versions and drafts of the story. Some in prose, some in poetry. The second largest, around 100 pages again, maybe, is the same story told again (with slight differences) in poetry. The drafts are early Tolkien work, where the Noldor are still called Gnomes and Morgoth has the same Melko/Melkor. I’d be tempted to say that without having read The Silmarillion, you’d find little enjoyment (perhaps even sense!) in this collaborative work.
Of course, if you’ve read The Lord of the Rings, you will have read Strider’s version of the story he tells the hobbits at Weathertop; he and Arwen are a sort of reflection of the story, after all.
The Sundering Seas between them lay, And yet at last they met once more, And long ago they passed away In the forest singing sorrowless.
In 1981, Christopher Tolkien wrote to Rayner Unwin to say he had a book totally 1,968 pages long. This book was, as he writes in the Preface, his attempt at ‘know[ing] how the whole conception did in reality evolve from the earliest origins . . .’ His father, in a famous 1951 letter, called this story the ‘chief of the stories of The Silmarillion'. I would be tempted to agree with him, for my rating here does not reflect my rating of the story itself but the content of this book. As JRRT rightly calls it: a ‘heroic-fairy-romance’, and thought it ‘beautiful and powerful’. After all, on his wife’s grave the name Lúthien appears, and on his own, Beren.
For those intrigued: be warned, most of the book is the story told again and again, sometimes in prose, sometimes in poetry, and with slight differences. Even Fingolfin’s stand against Morgoth appears in one such draft, with the wording very similar to how it appears in The Silmarillion. Though a little frustrating and tiring, reading all the drafts and rehashes, one can’t help but feel a deep respect for Christopher Tolkien and the love and respect he likewise poured into his father’s work.
Next up is The Fall of Gondolin, and then the Great Tales are done. I’ve finished a few of the random extra Middle-earth tales and poems, so I am drawing ever closer to the 12-volume History of Middle-earth, which I can’t decide whether I’m brave enough for....more
Taking a short break from the Great Tales, I dove into this strange little collection. Tom Bombadil is a funny part of Middle-earth.70th book of 2024.
Taking a short break from the Great Tales, I dove into this strange little collection. Tom Bombadil is a funny part of Middle-earth. In a way, he seems very disjointed from the rest of the world, and yet, at the same time, an ancient and powerful part of it. He was inspired by a doll Michael, Tolkien's son, played with as a child. In my introduction, the letters are quoted, where Tolkien himself answered some questions by saying he preferred to leave Tom as a mystery. To Peter Hastings, 'I don't think Tom needs philosophising about, and is not improved by it. But many have found him an odd or indeed discordant ingredient.' My feelings about him are paradoxical. On the one hand, I am enamored with the early bits of The Lord of the Rings, where everything feels more playful, before the adventure truly begins. The Shire is a place of contentment and whimsy.
I returned to my copy of The Lord of the Rings to consider Tom Bombadil in the light of this first poem, which predates the trilogy. Bombadil is introduced the same in both, only with a tense change. In the poem:
Old Tom Bombadil was a merry fellow; bright blue his jacket was and his boots were yellow
And in LOTR (bk.i, ch. vii):
Old Tom Bombadil is a merry fellow; bright blue his jacket was, and his boots are yellow
It is here that Frodo questions Goldberry.
'Fair lady!' said Frodo again after a while. 'Tell me, if my asking does not seem foolish, who is Tom Bombadil?' 'He is,' said Goldberry, staying her swift movements and smiling.
It is easy to see Bombadil as God, though Tolkien himself denies such claim. And later, Frodo, questions again, but this time Bombadil himself.
'Who are you, Master?' he asked. 'Eh, what?' said Tom sitting up, and his eyes glinting in the gloom. 'Don't you know my name yet? That's the only answer. Tell me, who are you, alone, yourself and nameless? But you are young and I am old. Eldest, that's what I am. Mark my words, my friends: Tom was here before the river and the trees: Tom remembers the first raindrop and the first acorn. He made paths before the Big People, and saw the little People arriving. He was here before the Kings and the graves and the Barrow-wights. When the Elves passed westward, Tom was here already, before the seas were bent. He knew the dark under the stars when it was fearless—before the Dark Lord came from outside.'
Once again, it puts us in mind of God. But Bombdail in the poem, though there is Old Man Willow, Goldberry, Barrow-wights, etc., everything (perhaps because of the rhyme?) feels happy and childlike. 'You let me out again, Old Man Willow! / I am stiff lying here; they're no sort of pillow'.
Middle-earth appears in a few, like "The Sea-Bell" (which Auden considered Tolkien's best poem), "The Last Ship", "Oliphaunt". The latter is penned, supposedly, by Samwise Gamgee himself, along with a few others. And there are a few credited to Bilbo too. So they become stories within the Middle-earth universe. One can see, the introduction says, how many of the poems would be told and loved by hobbits. There is also "The Man in the Moon Stayed Up Too Late", penned by Bilbo and sung by Frodo in Bree in LOTR.
So once again, as I read more of Tolkien's expanded Middle-earth texts, I see how many crossovers there are. Of course, he had been working on the stories and characters for some twenty years before The Fellowship of the Ring was published. It was all gathering, overlapping. These are cute, whimsical and fun. If I had a small child (and/or hobbit) to read them too, they'd be all the sweeter. It doesn't unlock too much more, but reinforces the history of Bombadil as an old Tolkien character, reformed, repurposed, and fitted into the trilogy. I do have a soft spot for him, all things told....more
Vonnegut was a big part of my early 20s, and I haven't read anything of his for a little while. I used to religiously wear a t-shirt69th book of 2024.
Vonnegut was a big part of my early 20s, and I haven't read anything of his for a little while. I used to religiously wear a t-shirt that had the gravestone on it that read EVERYTHING WAS BEAUTIFUL AND NOTHING HURT. Slaughterhouse-Five shook up what I thought a novel could be or do. And I guess in a way, something of Vonnegut's humour and worldview helped me construct mine as adulthood became something I no longer looked at from afar but was a 'part' of.
After watching Hozier at Finsbury Park, I had some time in the city. I read this cross-legged in Foyles in London the other day. I have a bad habit of reading books in bookshops so I don't have to buy them. It's maybe unethical.
Vonnegut dies a lot in 'controlled near-death experience[s]'. When dead, he goes to the 'blue tunnel' and meets the other men and women who have gone to heaven. There is no hell. So he even meets Hitler up there. It's sometimes hard to know whether we should laugh or not. Hitler says to Vonnegut, "I paid my dues along with everybody else", and that he hopes a 'stone cross, since he was a Christian' be placed on the grounds of the United Nations headquarters in New York, dated '1889-1945', and read, '"Entschuldigen Sie." Roughly translated into English, this comes out, "I Beg Your Pardon," or "Excuse me."'
Mary Shelley, after Vonnegut tells her that people are always calling the monster 'Frankenstein', replies, "That's not so ignorant after all. There are two monsters in my story, not one. And one of them, the scientist, is indeed named Frankenstein."
I did laugh (as in, I didn't laugh at all, but my brain was tickled), when Vonnegut said he was asked to provide some filler and interview someone who is actually alive: 'He is science-fiction writer Kilgore Trout.'
But Vonnegut also chats to Isaac Asimov, Shakespeare, Sir Isaac Newton, and more.
Fun for those who already have a soft spot for old Kurt. ...more
Read for a bookclub back in July. Despite being science-fiction, the noir elements seemed to severely date the text. Gibson's prose72nd book of 2024.
Read for a bookclub back in July. Despite being science-fiction, the noir elements seemed to severely date the text. Gibson's prose was clunky and chockfull of jargon. I didn't find the plot, the characters or the prose remotely desirable. Some of the ideas were fascinating, and reading this after watching so many things that have come from it, most obviously The Matrix, it is hard to ignore its cultural significance... but it's a chore to read. ...more
The "epilogue" of The Lord of the Rings; I never knew it existed until the other day. The song itself is small, just three stanzas, 68th book of 2024.
The "epilogue" of The Lord of the Rings; I never knew it existed until the other day. The song itself is small, just three stanzas, but this edition shows just two lines per double-page spread with plenty of illustrations (quirky, 70s style fantasy illustrations, at that). And of course a bit of extra material at the back to pad it out some more.
Tolkien wrote it originally in the 20s (so it's supposed) and it was a composition in Old Norse. He called it Vestr um haf, or "West Over Sea". In 1968, Tolkien gave it to his secretary, Joy Hill, as a gift for setting up his new office.
After Tolkien's death in 1973, she showed it to Donald Swann, who loved it, and set it to music and included it in The Road Goes Ever On in 1978. The poem was also illustrated by Pauline Baynes in 1974 and put on a poster.
[image]
Here is the poem. I will keep it neither secret nor safe.
Bilbo's Last Song (At the Grey Havens)
Day is ended, dim my eyes, but journey long before me lies. Farewell, friends! I hear the call. The ship's beside the stony wall. Foam is white and waves are grey; beyond the sunset leads my way. Foam is salt, the wind is free; I hear the rising of the Sea.
Farewell, friends! The sails are set, the wind is east, the moorings fret. Shadows long before me lie, beneath the ever-bending sky, but islands lie behind the Sun that I shall raise ere all is done; lands there are to west of West, where night is quiet and sleep is rest.
Guided by the Lonely Star, beyond the utmost harbour-bar I'll find the havens fair and free, and beaches of the Starlit Sea. Ship, my ship! I seek the West, and fields and mountains ever blest. Farewell to Middle-Earth at last. I see the Star above your mast!
I won't be including this in my yearly challenge, as Christopher has only written several lines to accompany each picture; it involves more looking thI won't be including this in my yearly challenge, as Christopher has only written several lines to accompany each picture; it involves more looking than reading.
It is a beautiful book in itself, with a painting of Glaurung on the slipcase. Inside are 48 pictures by Tolkien, almost all of them illustrations of Middle-earth, save a few at the end. His watercolour work is truly beautiful, and shows great control and skill. My favourite is probably, still, his painting of Taniquetil, which you'll sometimes find on the front of copies of The Silmarillion. It is the highest mountain that guards Valinor and where Manwë puts his throne. And in the foreground, one of the white ships of the Telerin Elves.
[image]
I was in Oxford a few months ago and more than anything else, in the Bodleian Library gift shop, there were reproductions of this particular piece of Tolkien's called "Bilbo Comes to the Huts of the Raft-elves", from The Hobbit. Large blown up reproductions for framing, and even tote bags. I wondered at the time why this painting over all the others, but it is a nice one.
[image]
And finally, a nostalgic one for me. This painting of Smaug is on the front cover of my mother's copy of The Hobbit, the one she read to me as a child. So always a favourite.
Disappointing. Not a complete failure at all, but one of my most anticipated reads of the year has fallen partly flat. Maybe nothing67th book of 2024.
Disappointing. Not a complete failure at all, but one of my most anticipated reads of the year has fallen partly flat. Maybe nothing Cusk writes from now on will hold a candle to the Outline Trilogy. The magnum opus has passed and now we are left with what follows. The echoes, so to speak; because the best part, "The Diver" echoes the trilogy: we have characters in a restaurant talking about their lives: art, parenthood, marriage, it could be a scene from the trilogy, but it's not quite. I've always loved the sharpness of Cusk's prose, and the emotion she generates through a sort of coldness. Although that remains the same here, it feels passionless. I've been trying to finish this since last night. I could have easily finished it on yesterday's commute, when I got home, this morning on my day off, this afternoon or even earlier this evening. I've looked at it guiltily a few times today, but haven't been compelled to pick it up. Ironically, as a novel of 'ideas' as it's being regarded, the ideas feel more forced and less poignant than their natural occurrences in the trilogy. I hate to keep comparing, but it's natural. It is better than Second Place, which was a dud, even forgettable. I do think Cusk is one of the top writers working today, and still think that, but this felt like she was trying too hard. That's the most unnerving thing to read, a good writer trying too hard. A character even talks about the nature of an artist not being 'seen' in an artwork, but I saw Cusk hiding behind all the curtains here. Even the bits in the "The Spy" that felt a little meta were distracting, because Cusk was like the little boy's face in the window in the final paintings observed in the novel. I could see her there, peeking in. A little too contrived....more