Starch's Reviews > Storm Front

Storm Front by Jim Butcher
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
120374803
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: fantasy

Very basic and very cliche.

I find myself saying the same things about this kind of book: this is exactly how to NOT write a male power fantasy. (then again, a lot of people like this book. so feel free to ignore me)

Meet Harry Dresden. He's extremely powerful (so you'd think he's cool) but in practice he's really weak, nearly dying no matter whom he fights against (so you'll cheer for him as the underdog). He reports to the reader multiple times on how he acts "like a gentleman" with women, and how he doesn't understand why people think it's creepy. He then complains to the reader on how he always fails with women. Like I wrote in my review to The Name Of The Wind, this could have been an opportunity to let the protagonist realize why people think he's creepy and finally grow up -- but no, the author takes his side...

The plot uses about every cliche possible: The protagonist is an extremely powerful and knowledgeable wizard, but he works as a private investigator (of sorts) and is on the verge of bankruptcy. A murder is committed, and suddenly everyone thinks it's the protagonist (for no good reason. He wasn't even framed or anything). Harry can't call for help because the "white council" of wizards doesn't trust him because of his past, so he has to work alone. Harry has a powerful spirit ally named Bob, who blackmails harry for a day off; and guess what? that's the one day most of the plot takes place in. We get a climax between Harry, one of the most powerful wizards (as we're told), and a guy who barely knows anything about magic. Harry almost dies. It's presented like Harry's disadvantage is because he can't use magic to kill, but that makes little sense -- does he not know any non-lethal spells? after studying for years and possessing immense talents? come on.

We're told Harry is really strong so we'll look up to him, but we're always shown how weak he is so we'll cheer for him as the underdog. He's extremely talented, but he's very poor. He's very honest and a "good guy", but no one trusts him and everyone try to make his life more difficult. He acts like a gentleman with women, but they won't sleep with him. See my point? This is everything wrong with the average nerdy teenager's power fantasy: "All evidence says I'm a loser, but actually I'm secretly very powerful and amazing".

The book makes fun of science for missing all the monsters and wizards that clearly exist in the world. It's one of my least favorite storytelling tropes, especially since it reflects a real sentiment that exists among way too many people ("it's true because my book says so, but science can't see it so science is stupid. And I'm really smart because I see that science is stupid"). It's as if people really can't tell reality from fiction, and I guess that scares me a bit.

The magic itself is completely unimaginative. Mostly Harry just speaks a word and wind/fire/whatever comes to him. There's not even a semblance of originality.

Speaking of originality: it's about an orphan wizard named Harry, who's really-really special but no one believes him and everyone always accuse him whenever something bad happens. He killed a very bad wizard years ago, which is the cause of his reputation. He does magic mainly by speaking single words. There's a clear bad guy in the story, but it turns out he has nothing to do with plot and is only a misdirect by the author.

At the end (spoiler for the same cliche ending you've read a hundred times before): (view spoiler)

Tried reading this book years ago and couldn't finish it, but people keep recommending it to me, so I decided to give it another shot. I'll try reading the second book, as many say the series improves a lot later on.

Contrary to what this review implies, I didn't hate the book. The prose is solid and the main character has potential. If only it had better plotting, less cliches, and anything even a little original, it could have been alright.
27 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Storm Front.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
April 24, 2024 – Shelved
April 24, 2024 – Shelved as: fantasy

Comments Showing 1-19 of 19 (19 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Charles (last edited Apr 24, 2024 06:26AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Charles ... Very basic and very cliche. ...

If Jim Butcher looked over his shoulder, he'd likely think the same.

The book is 25-years old. He wrote it for a 6-week, VoTech writing class. Its also one of the early examples of the urban fantasy genre. To Butcher's credit, he popularized a few of the tropes now common in the literature.

Now, urban fantasy is a serious money maker. The audience for the stories has expanded to beyond teenagers in a basement playing D&D. Its written by folks with: MFAs, short stories and even novels under their belt.

Having written that, his last book makes me think he should retire and rest on his laurels.


Starch About Butcher creating/popularizing some of these tropes -- fair enough. Maybe it wasn't fair to call it cliche. But a book being old (or written in a short time) doesn't excuse it for being bad. And this book is, in parts, straightforwardly bad.


Katie Hanna I feel the same way about this book. Harry Dresden is just not a likable character the way the author presents him--at least not for me. And I was disappointed to see that he doesn't improve when I read more books in the series.


Starch Katie wrote: "And I was disappointed to see that he doesn't improve when I..."

Do other aspects of the story improve later?


message 5: by Katie (last edited Apr 24, 2024 07:17AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Katie Hanna Starch wrote: "Katie wrote: "And I was disappointed to see that he doesn't improve when I..."

Do other aspects of the story improve later?"


Ermm... I think the magic worldbuilding got a little more interesting, and the author introduced more monsters / magical creatures. My brother says the worldbuilding is the biggest draw of the series and keeps improving over time; but it also wasn't enough to draw ME to read more beyond Book 4, so... maybe not?


Starch Katie wrote: "Ermm... I think the magic worldbuilding got a little mo..."

Guess I'll read a bit more. I just got tired of hearing this series being recommended all the time, and decided to finally read it.


Lizz I didn’t like this one either. I wanted to agree with all the rave reviews, but alas…. Dresden was such an awful character. Thin plot and barely discernible character motivations.


Dagmar Rokita At least the MC is relatable


message 9: by Starch (last edited Apr 26, 2024 06:09AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Starch Dagmar wrote: "At least the MC is relatable"

Hope I'm not sounding too harsh, but I very much disagree. "Relatable", in the sense of "flawed", only works when the flaws are real. Here, on the other hand, they aren't: In terms of competence, Harry's weakness is artificial, as I explained in my review; in terms of character, the author clearly thinks that Harry is acting correctly and that it's society's judgement that is wrong.


message 10: by Dagmar (last edited Apr 26, 2024 08:41AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Dagmar Rokita He didn't do anything wrong. He's just too nice and society uses nice people like him (source: I experienced it personally)
No matter what he does, he's "that worse person," and I really don't understand why. If he was smarter, he would just say "screw society, be the dark lone guy from typical grimdark monster-hunter fantasy". I guess society just doesn't like strong male characters.


Starch You're thinking like a reader, not like an author.

"No matter what he does, he's "that worse person," and I really don't understand why".

The 'why' is that the author wants you to sympathize with the protagonist. The reason it doesn't feel right is because it's a badly written plot device.

Of course people sometimes dislike a person for no good reason, but they always think they have a good reason -- which this story fails to show.


Dagmar Rokita I guess we just have different sense of humor, maybe that's why I like this character


Starch Dagmar wrote: "I guess we just have different sense of humor, maybe that's why I like this character"

The "different sense of humor" being me taking your word at face value? If so, definitely.


David Demetradze It will have all of it less cliches far more development, more uniqueness , more epic stuff. First book is reslly not that great and everybody agrees to it.


Starch On the one hand, you say: "First book is really not that great and everybody agrees to it."

On the other hand, you gave the book five stars.

Which side should I believe?


David Demetradze Well i gave to the all the books in the series as a whole because it is very close to my heart not because first book is so great.


message 17: by Mark (new) - rated it 3 stars

Mark I like the book significantly more than you, but your review is thoughtfully written and makes good points.

Despite what some people claim, the fundamentals of the writing do not improve as the series go on. The first book is not noticeable worse than the later ones. Sure, the first book isn't the best in the series but it represents the average pretty well. [I just checked and it seems you already have read book 2 and found this out for yourself.]

In the following books there is more fleshing out of the world and there are definitely a few interesting recurring sidekicks and villains and long term plot cycles but the foundation remains the same.

I guess a couple other things change. Women (clothed and naked) start throwing themselves at Dresden every book -- I don't consider that an improvement. There is rarely again a sense that Dresden is not powerful. In fact in later books it is revealed that Dresden is a very special boy and one of the most important people on the planet and everything revolves around him (gag me).


Starch Mark wrote: "I like the book significantly more than you, but your review is thoughtfully written and makes good points..."

Thank you! I wasn't sure how much to trust all the people who say it gets better. Your comment clarified a lot.


carol. (not getting notifications) "This is everything wrong with the average nerdy teenager's power fantasy: "All evidence says I'm a loser, but actually I'm secretly very powerful and amazing".

Nailed it.


back to top